Dismissed
Nisha Rani v. State of Haryana and Others
Punjab & Haryana HCCWP/6561/2019
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.6561 of 2019 (O&M) Date of Decision.21.08.2019
Nisha Rani
...Petitioner
Vs
State of Haryana and others ...Respondents
Present: Mr. Sandeep Kumar Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Harish Nain, AAG, Haryana.
Mr. Rajiv Goel, Advocate for respondent No.6.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
-.-
AMIT RAWAL J. (ORAL)
Learned State counsel submits that respondent No.6 has been
adjusted and therefore, grievance of petitioner stands vindicated.
Writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
(AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE August 21, 2019 Pankaj* Whether speaking/reasoned No Whether reportable No
PANKAJ KUMAR 2019.08.27 14:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Nisha Rani
State of Haryana
Amit Rawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court