Disposed

Shri Pal v. State of Haryana and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC18 Sept 2019CWP/6015/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court directed the Engineering-in-Chief, Public Health Engineering Department, Haryana, to consider a representation dated 19.02.2018 within two months on pain of costs. The writ petition stands disposed of with this direction.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent No. 2 to consider representation dated 19.02.2018 within two months on pain of costs of ₹25,000.

Shri Pal Vs State of Haryana and Others — Service and Employment | Punjab & Haryana HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶2

CWP No.6015 of 2019 (O&M) Date of Decision.18.09.2019

¶3

Shri Pal ...Petitioner Vs

¶4

State of Haryana and others ...Respondents

¶5

Present: Mr. S.K. Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶6

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL

¶7

-.-

¶8

AMIT RAWAL J. (ORAL)

¶9

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner will be satisfied if a direction is issued to the 2^nd respondent-Engineering-in-Chief, Public Health Engineering Department, Haryana, Sector 4, Panchkula to consider the representation dated 19.02.2018 (Annexure P-3) within a stipulated period.

¶10

Without going into the merits and demerits of the claim of the petitioner, I deem it appropriate to direct 2^nd respondent-Engineering-in-Chief, Public Health Engineering Department, Haryana, Sector 4, Panchkula to consider the representation dated 19.02.2018 (Annexure P-3) within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and shall pass a speaking order thereon, failing which respondent No.2 shall be liable to pay costs of `25,000/- to the petitioner. This condition of imposing costs is only to prevent petitioner running from pillar to post and avail remedy of contempt in case of non-compliance of directions issued by this Court.

¶11

The writ petition stands disposed of with the above direction.

¶12

		(AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE
September	18, 2019
Pankaj*
	Whether speaking/reaso	ned No
	Whether reportable	No

¶13

PANKAJ KUMAR 2019.09.20 17:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Shri Pal v. State of Haryana and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shri Pal v. State of Haryana and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Parveen Vs State of Haryana and Others

Sahdev Sharma Vs State of Haryana and Others

Rampal Vs State of Haryana and Others

Takdeer Vs State of Haryana and Others

Yoginder Vs Haryana Staff Selection Commission

Suresh Kumar Vs State of Haryana and Another