Dismissed
Uma v. State of Haryana and Others
Punjab & Haryana HCCWP/5045/2019
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-5045-2019 Date of decision: - 26.02.2019
Uma
....Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and others
.....Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI
Present:Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner.
HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (ORAL)
After arguing for some time, counsel for the petitioner states that he be allowed to withdraw the present writ petition with a liberty to file fresh petition on the same cause of action with better particulars.
Dismissed as withdrawn, with the liberty, as prayed for.
February 26, 2019 naresh.k
( HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI ) JUDGE
Whether reasoned/speaking? No Whether reportable? No
NARESH KUMAR 2019.02.27 14:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Uma
State of Haryana and others
HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court