Petition by Gram Panchayat challenging State interference in development works relief rendered infructuous as tenders stopped and funds returned upon reply filed
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I N THE HI GH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDI GARH
Ci vi l Wr i t Pet i t i on No. 3961 of 2019 ( O&M) DATE OF DECI SI ON: 26. 02. 2019
Gr am Panchayat , Pal i
…. . Pet i t i oner
ver sus
St at e of Har yana and ot her s
. . . . . Respondent s
CORAM: - HON’ BLE MR. JUSTI CE KRI SHNA MURARI , CHI EF JUSTI CE HON’ BLE MR. JUSTI CE ARUN PALLI , JUDGE
Pr esent : Mr . Raj esh Lamba, Advocat e f or t he pet i t i oner Shr i Deepak Bal yan, Addi t i onal Advocat e Gener al , Har yana
KRI SHNA MURARI , CHI EF JUSTI CE : ( Or al )
Gr am Panchayat , Pal i , Di st r i ct Far i dabad, has appr oached t hi s Cour t r ai si ng a gr i evance wi t h r espect t o i nt er f er ence of t he St at e aut hor i t i es i nt o t hei r r i ght t o get cer t ai n wor ks execut ed wi t hi n t hei r t er r i t or i al l i mi t s.
A shor t r epl y f i l ed on behal f of r espondent Nos. 1 t o 4 by t he Execut i ve Engi neer , Panchayat i Raj , Far i dabad, i n cour t t oday i s t aken on r ecor d. I n par agr aph- 8 t her eof , i t i s st at ed t hat t he pr oceedi ngs f or i nvi t i ng t ender s have al r eady been st opped by t he of f i ce of t he deponent and t he f unds al r eady r ecei ved f or devel opment wor k have al so been r et ur ned t o t he of f i ce of Addi t i onal Deput y Commi ssi oner , Far i dabad, f or t he r evi sed admi ni st r at i ve appr oval so t hat t he devel opment wor k of t he vi l l age can be st ar t ed by t he Gr am Panchayat .
PARKASH CHAND 2019.02.26 17:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP- 3961- 2019
- 2 -
I n vi ew of t he af or esai d f act s, t he r el i ef sought i n t hi s pet i t i on i s r ender ed i nf r uct uous whi ch i s not bei ng obj ect ed t o by l ear ned counsel f or t he pet i t i oner .
Pet i t i on accor di ngl y st ands di smi ssed.
( KRI SHNA MURARI ) CHI EF JUSTI CE
( ARUN PALLI ) JUDGE
NOTE: Whet her speaki ng/ non- speaki ng: Speaki ng Whet her r epor t abl e: YES/ NO
PARKASH CHAND 2019.02.26 17:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Gram Panchayat, Mali
State of Haryana and others
Krishna Murari
Arun Palli
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
