Haryana High Court allowed the appellant's prayer to withdraw a review application against a single judge's order. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn. The order contains no substantive legal reasoning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I N THE HI GH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDI GARH
LPA No. 318 of 2019 ( O&M)
DATE OF DECI SI ON: 25. 02. 2019
The St at e of Har yana and ot her s …. . Appel l ant s
ver sus
Deepa Devi and anot her
CORAM: - HON’ BLE MR. JUSTI CE KRI SHNA MURARI , CHI EF JUSTI CE HON’ BLE MR. JUSTI CE ARUN PALLI , JUDGE
Pr esent : Shr i Deepak Bal yan, Addi t i onal Advocat e Gener al , Har yana f or t he appel l ant s
KRI SHNA MURARI , CHI EF JUSTI CE : ( Or al )
Shr i Bal yan, l ear ned Addi t i onal Advocat e Gener al , Har yana, at t he out set , submi t s t hat t he St at e i nt ends t o f i l e a r evi ew appl i cat i on bef or e t he l ear ned si ngl e Judge agai nst t he or der i mpugned i n t hi s appeal and, hence, he may be per mi t t ed t o wi t hdr aw t hi s appeal .
Pr ayer made i s al l owed.
Appeal accor di ngl y st ands di smi ssed as wi t hdr awn wi t h l i ber t y t o appr oach t he l ear ned si ngl e Judge by maki ng a r evi ew appl i cat i on.
( KRI SHNA MURARI ) CHI EF JUSTI CE
( ARUN PALLI ) JUDGE
par kash
NOTE: Whet her speaki ng/ non- speaki ng: Speaki ng Whet her r epor t abl e: YES/ NO
PARKASH CHAND 2019.02.26 16:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
PARKASH CHAND 2019.02.26 16:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
The State of Haryana and others
Deepa Devi and another
Krishnamurari
Arun Palli
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
