The petition, filed by Union of India, was disposed of because the private respondents, who had held provisional admission, failed to qualify the written examination.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-3945 of 2018 Date of decision : 29.10.2019
Union of India and others
.... PETITIONERS
Versus
Central Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench and others
..... RESPONDENTS
CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHARMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARINDER SINGH SIDHU
Present: Mr. Lakhinder Bir Singh, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Aman Chaudhary, Advocate, with Mr. R.S. Dadwal, Advocate, for respondents No.2 to 10.
RAJIV SHARMA, J.
In sequel to the order dated 28.05.2019, result of the private respondents, produced in a sealed cover, has been opened in the court. The private respondents, who were permitted to sit provisionally, could not qualify the written examination.
Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of.
( RAJIV SHARMA )
JUDGE
( HARINDER SINGH SIDHU ) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
October 29, 2019 ndj
NAROTAM DASS 2019.10.31 16:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document PHHC CHANDIGARH
Union of India
Central Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench
Rajiv Sharma
Harinder Singh Sidhu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
