In a PIL filed regarding the illegal axing of trees, the Single Judge directed the Executive Officer to decide the representation within three weeks via a speaking order and disposed of the petition.
Directed the Executive Officer to decide the representation within three weeks by a speaking/detailed order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-PIL-210 of 2019 Date of decision : 24.10.2019
Harsh Kumar
.... Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others
..... Respondents
CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHARMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARINDER SINGH SIDHU
Present: Mr. Gurmeet Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner.
RAJIV SHARMA, J.
The petitioner has already made a representation to the Executive Officer, Municipal Council, Khanna – respondent No.2, against the illegal axing of tree by respondent No.4. The Executive Officer, Municipal Council, Khanna – respondent No.2, is directed to decide the representation within a period of three weeks from today by passing a speaking/detailed order.
Petition stands disposed of.
( RAJIV SHARMA ) JUDGE
October 24, 2019 ( HARINDER SINGH SIDHU ) ndj JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
NAROTAM DASS 2019.10.24 18:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document PHHC CHANDIGARH
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a representation against illegal felling should be decided by a quick order.
Harsh Kumar
State of Punjab
Municipal Council Khanna
Rajiv Sharma
Harinder Singh Sidhu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
