Disposed

Jagjit Singh v. State of Punjab and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC8 Feb 2019CWP/3505/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition, the High Court directed the respondents to decide the petitioner's pending representation regarding unissued pensionary benefits and ACPs within three months and release any monetary benefit within two months.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondents to decide the petitioner's representation within three months and release any monetary benefit thereafter.

Jagjit Singh Vs State of Punjab and… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Punjab & Haryana HC (2019)

¶1

CWP-3505-2019

¶2

-1-

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶4

CWP-3505-2019 Date of decision: - 08.02.2019

Jagjit Singh

....Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and others

¶9

.....Respondents

¶10

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI

¶11

Present:Mr. Sangeet Pal Singh Baaghi, Advocate, for the petitioner.

¶12

¶13

HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (ORAL)

¶14

Counsel for the petitioner states that though the petitioner retired on 31.01.2018 but some of the pensionary benefits have not been released to him so far.

¶15

Counsel for the petitioner further states that the GPF is still to be released and the claim of the petitioner for the grant of ACPs after completion of four years and nine years of service is also pending consideration with the respondents.

¶16

Counsel for the petitioner further states that for the relief which has been sought in the present writ petition, the petitioner has submitted the representation dated 10.08.2018 (Annexure P-4), which is still pending consideration with the respondents and the petitioner will be

¶17

NARESH KUMAR 2019.02.13 16:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

¶18

CWP-3505-2019

¶19

-2-

¶20

satisfied, at this stage, in case a time bound direction is issued to the respondents to decide the said representation.

¶21

In view of the request made, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and the claim being made by the petitioner, the respondents are directed to decide the representation dated 10.08.2018 (Annexure P-4) by passing a speaking order within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. In case after the decision, it is found that the petitioner is entitled for any monetary benefit, the same shall also be released to him within a period of next two months.

¶22

Present writ petition stands disposed of.

¶23

( HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI ) February 08, 2019 JUDGE naresh.k Whether reasoned/speaking? Yes Whether reportable? No

¶24

NARESH KUMAR 2019.02.13 16:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

Jagjit Singh v. State of Punjab and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jagjit Singh v. State of Punjab and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sanjeev Kumar Vs Sat Prakash and Anr.

Balbir Singh and Ors. Vs State of Punjab and Others

Satbir Singh Vs State of Haryana and Others

Sant Singh Vs Punjab State Civil Supply Corporation and Another

Charanjit Singh Vs Punjab State Poer Corporation Ltd. and Others

Veena Rani Vs State of Haryana and Others