Petitioners sought to withdraw the present writ petition with a liberty to file representation regarding the claim raised therein.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-3359-2019 Date of decision: - 07.02.2019
Balbir Singh and others
....Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and others
.....Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI
Present:Mr. A.S. Gagrha, Advocate, for Mr. Vivek Baghla, Advocate for the petitioners.
HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (ORAL)
After arguing for some time, counsel for the petitioners states that he be allowed to withdraw the present writ petition with a liberty to the petitioners to file representation in respect of the claim which has been made in the present writ petition at the first instance.
Dismissed as withdrawn, with the liberty, as prayed for.
( HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI ) February 07, 2019 JUDGE naresh.k
Whether reasoned/speaking? No Whether reportable? No
NARESH KUMAR 2019.02.08 13:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Balbir Singh and others
State of Punjab and others
HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
