Single Judge dismissed the writ petition because comparison of the petitioner's sealed marks with the cut-off for the post of Auction Recorder revealed the petitioner scored 160 out of a required 164, leaving no cause of action.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
YOGESH SHARMA 2019.09.30 12:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 1
CWP-30394-2018 (O&M)
258
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-30394-2018 (O&M) Date of decision : 27.09.2019
Kunal Satija
... Petitioner(s)
Versus
State of Haryana and others
... Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
Present: Mr. Jasbir Mor, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Hitesh Pandit, Addl. A.G., Haryana.
Mr. Gaurav Jindal, Advocate for respondent No.2.
AMIT RAWAL, J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the State has produced detailed Marks obtained by the petitioner, in a sealed cover, which has been opened, perused and on comparison with cut off 164 for the post of Auction Recorder, the petitioner has obtained 160 marks. In such circumstances, no cause of action survives in the present writ petition and accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed.
( AMIT RAWAL ) 27.09.2019 JUDGE Yogesh Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/ No Whether Reportable Yes/ No
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition survives given the petitioner obtained 160 marks out of a cut-off of 164 for the post of Auction Recorder.
Whether the petitioner is entitled to recruitment when the court finds no remaining cause of action.
Whether the writ petition should be dismissed in light of the verified marks obtained by the petitioner.
Kunal Satija
State of Haryana
AMIT RAWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
