Allowed

Satender Yadav v. State of Haryana and Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC26 Sept 2019CWP/21161/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought writ relief regarding delayed transmission of documents leading to rejection of Haryana Civil Services candidature. Court refused to revisit facts, held damages relatable remedy, and granted permission to withdraw petition with liberty.

What did the court decide?

Permission granted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to avail appropriate remedy.

Satender Yadav Vs State of Haryana and Ors. — Service and Employment | Punjab & Haryana HC (2019)

¶1

YOGESH SHARMA 2019.10.03 11:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 1

¶2

CWP-21161-2019 (O&M)

¶3

128 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶4

CWP-21161-2019 (O&M) Date of decision : 26.09.2019

Satender Yadav

... Petitioner(s)

Versus

State of Haryana and others

¶9

... Respondent(s)

¶10

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL

¶11

Present: Mr. Suresh Kumar Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioner. ****

¶12

AMIT RAWAL, J. (ORAL)

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that parent department of petitioner had sent the requisite documents to Administrative Secretary i.e. respondent No.3/Additional Chief Secretary, Government of Haryana, Department of Administration of Justice for considering the candidature of petitioner to the post of Haryana Civil Services (Ex. Branch), in pursuance to Advertisement No.4 of 2019 dated 13.06.2019 (Annexure P-2), but respondent No.3 did not send the said documents to the Haryana Public Service Commission/respondent No.2, in time, resulting into, rejection of candidature of petitioner.

¶14

In my view, the aforementioned contention of learned counsel for petitioner cannot be now accepted by putting clock back and petitioner has an independent remedy to claim damages.

¶15

Faced with the aforesaid situation, learned counsel for petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to avail appropriate remedy, in accordance with law. Ordered accordingly.

¶16

26.09.2019		( AM	IT RAWAL) JUDGE
Yogesh Sharma
	Whether speaking/reasoned	Yes/	No
	Whether Reportable	Yes/	No

Satender Yadav v. State of Haryana and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Satender Yadav v. State of Haryana and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Neeraj Vs Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam and Others

Vipin Kumar Vs Union of India and Others

Suman Devi Vs State of Haryana and Others

Dr. Santosh Vs State of Haryana and Ors.

Puneet Walia Vs State of Haryana and Anr.

Sandhya Mangla and Ors. Vs State of Haryana and Others