Disposed

Randhir Singh and Others v. State of Haryana and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC16 Aug 2019CWP/21508/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court directed the respondents to decide representations dated 07.06.2018 regarding the petitioners' claim for re-fixation of pay within three months, referencing earlier upheld orders without expressing an opinion on the merits.

What did the court decide?

Directing respondents to decide petitioners' representations regarding re-fixation of pay within three months.

Randhir Singh and Others Vs State… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Punjab & Haryana HC (2019)

¶1

CWP-21508-2019

¶2

-1-

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶4

CWP-21508-2019 Date of decision: - 16.08.2019

¶5

Randhir Singh and others

¶6

....Petitioners

¶7

Versus

¶8

State of Haryana and others

¶9

.....Respondents

¶10

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI

¶11

Present:Mr. Aditya Yadav, Advocate for the petitioners.

¶12

¶13

HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (ORAL)

¶14

Present writ petition has been filed by the petitioners claiming the re-fixation of their pay in view of the orders of this Court passed in CWP No.16084 of 1997, CWP No.2757 of 1998 and CWP No.4518 of 2000 which were upheld by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, vide order dated 08.12.2015 (Annexure P-5) being Civil Appeal No.8661 of 2009.

¶15

Petitioners claim that they are similarly situated with those who have been granted the relief by this Court but the same has not been granted to them only on the ground that they have not approached this Court and were not the petitioners in above mentioned writ petitions.

¶16

Counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners will be satisfied, at this stage, in case, a time bound direction is issued to the

¶17

NARESH KUMAR 2019.08.17 14:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

¶18

CWP-21508-2019

¶19

-2-

¶20

respondents to decide the representations dated 07.06.2018 (Annexure P-7 Colly.).

¶21

Keeping in view the request made by counsel for the petitioners and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and entitlement of the petitioners in respect of the claim made in the writ petition/representations, the respondents are directed to decide the representations dated 07.06.2018 (Annexure P-7 Colly.) within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. In case it is found that the petitioners are entitled for any relief, the same shall also be released to them within a period of next three months.

¶22

Present writ petition stands disposed of.

¶23

August 16, 2019 naresh.k

¶24

( HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI ) JUDGE

¶25

Whether reasoned/speaking? Yes Whether reportable? No

¶26

NARESH KUMAR 2019.08.17 14:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

Randhir Singh and Others v. State of Haryana and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Randhir Singh and Others v. State of Haryana and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Davinder Kaur Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

Dalel Singh and Another Vs State of Haryana and Others

Raj Singh and Another Vs State of Haryana and Others

Shibu Ram Vs Punjab State Power Corporation Limited (Pspcl) and Others

Surinder Kumar Bansal Vs State of Haryana and Others

P.S. Rakwal Vs State of Punjab & Ors.