Disposed

Raj Singh and Another v. State of Haryana and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC14 Aug 2019CWP/20577/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a writ petition concerning the re-fixation of pay, directing the respondents to consider pending representations submitted by the petitioners within three months of the order date without commenting on the merits of the claim.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the respondents to decide the representations dated 18.06.2018 within three months from the receipt of the certified copy of this order.

Raj Singh and Another Vs State of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Punjab & Haryana HC (2019)

¶1

CWP-20577-2019

¶2

-1-

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶4

CWP-20577-2019 Date of decision: - 14.08.2019

¶5

Raj Singh and another

¶6

....Petitioners

¶7

Versus

¶8

State of Haryana and others

¶9

.....Respondents

¶10

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI

¶11

Present:None for the petitioners.

¶12

¶13

HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (ORAL)

¶14

Present writ petition has been filed by the petitioners claiming the re-fixation of their pay in view of the orders of this Court passed in CWP No.16084 of 1997, CWP No.2757 of 1998 and CWP No.4518 of 2000 which were upheld by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, vide order dated 08.12.2015 (Annexure P-5) being Civil Appeal No.8661 of 2009.

¶15

Petitioners claim that they are similarly situated with those who have been granted the relief by this Court but the same has not been granted to them only on the ground that they have not approached this Court and were not the petitioners in above mentioned writ petitions.

¶16

From the pleadings, it transpires that for the relief which has been claimed in the present writ petition, petitioners have submitted representations dated 18.06.2018 (Annexure P-7 Colly.) which are still

¶17

NARESH KUMAR 2019.08.20 12:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

¶18

CWP-20577-2019

¶19

-2-

¶20

pending consideration with the respondents.

¶21

Interest of justice will be served, at this stage, in case a time bound direction is issued to the respondents to decide the said representations by passing the appropriate speaking order.

¶22

Without commenting upon the merits of the case or about the entitlement of the petitioners for the relief which has been claimed by them in the representations dated 18.06.2018 (Annexure P-7 Colly.), the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to decide the representations dated 18.06.2018 (Annexure P-7 Colly.) within a period of three months from the receipt of certified copy of this order.

¶23

Present writ petition stands disposed of.

¶24

( HARSI 019	MRAN SINGH SETHI ) JUDGE
Whether reasoned/speaking?	Yes
Whether reportable?	No

¶25

August 14, 2019 naresh.k

¶26

NARESH KUMAR 2019.08.20 12:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

Raj Singh and Another v. State of Haryana and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Raj Singh and Another v. State of Haryana and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prem Mangla Vs State of Punjab & Ors.

Shalig Ram Vs State of Punjab & Ors.

Kartar Singh Vs State of Punjab and Others

Davinder Kaur Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

Dalel Singh and Another Vs State of Haryana and Others

Virender Singh Sangwan Vs State of Haryana and Others