Dismissed

Radhey Krishan v. Haryana Vidyut Prasaran Nigam Limited

Punjab & Haryana HC8 Aug 2019CWP/21289/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner challenging non-implemention of deemed promotion and consequential benefits granted in 2019. Court directed respondent to consider representations and decide within one month, specifying costs for delay.

What did the court decide?

The respondent was directed to consider the representations submitted by the petitioner and take an appropriate decision thereon within one month from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this

Radhey Krishan Vs Haryana Vidyut… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Punjab & Haryana HC (2019)

¶1

YOGESH SHARMA 2019.08.08 15:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 1

¶2

CWP-21289-2019 (O&M)

¶3

108

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶5

CWP-21289-2019 (O&M) Date of decision : 08.08.2019

Radhey Krishan

... Petitioner

Versus

Haryana Vidyut Prarsaran Nigam Limited

¶10

... Respondents

¶11

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL

¶12

Present: None.

¶13

¶14

AMIT RAWAL, J. (ORAL)

¶15

Grievance of petitioner, in present writ petition, is that vide order dated 15.03.2019 (Annexure P-4), deemed date of promotion as Lower Division Clerk (Head Office) w.e.f. 19.06.2000 was granted to petitioner as per his position in ranking list as stood on 01.07.1999 and despite having entitled to all consequential benefits, the same have not so far been granted. In this regard, submitted representations (Annexures P-6 to P-9), but there is no adherence thereto.

¶16

It is very strange that order dated 15.03.2019 (Annexure P-4) entitling petitioner to all consequential benefits, is not being implemented by the Department, despite having been represented. It is a case, where respondents are required to be jolted, to wake up from slumber and take action.

¶17

Without going into the merits and de-merits of the case, I

¶18

YOGESH SHARMA 2019.08.08 15:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 2

¶19

CWP-21289-2019 (O&M)

¶20

dispose of the present writ petition with a direction to respondent to consider representations (Annexures P-6 to P9) and take appropriate decision thereon, in accordance with law, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

¶21

It is made clear that in case, decision is not taken within the time frame, there shall be costs of ` 25,000/- to be paid to petitioner. In case, the claim of petitioner is to be rejected, then a well reasoned and speaking order be passed and conveyed to petitioner. This condition of imposing costs is only to prevent petitioner to run from pillar to post and avail remedy of contempt in case of non-compliance of directions issued by this Court.

¶22

( AMIT RAWAL ) 08.08.2019 JUDGE Yogesh Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/ No Whether Reportable Yes/ No

Radhey Krishan v. Haryana Vidyut Prasaran Nigam Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Radhey Krishan v. Haryana Vidyut Prasaran Nigam Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Naresh Kumar Vs State of Haryana and Anr.

Anmol Singh Vs State of Haryana and Others

Sundeep Kumar Vs Chairman-Cum-Managing Director Dhbvn and Others

Dhiraj Kumar Vs State of Haryana and Others

Kushal Pal and Another Vs State of Haryana and Others

Sushil Kumar Vs State of Haryana and Others