Disposed

Kushal Pal and Another v. State of Haryana and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC8 Aug 2019CWP/21271/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order dismisses a writ petition on merits but directs the respondents to reconsider a representation regarding the transfer of convicts from Yamuna Nagar to Jind and Hisar. The court imposes a cost for non-compliance.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondents to consider petitioners' representation and take appropriate decision within two months; costs of 25,000 if no decision or unreasoned rejection.

Kushal Pal and Another Vs Stat… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Punjab & Haryana HC (2019)

¶1

YOGESH SHARMA 2019.08.08 12:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 1

¶2

CWP-21271-2019 (O&M)

¶3

106

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶5

CWP-21271-2019 (O&M) Date of decision : 08.08.2019

¶6

Kushal Pal and another

¶7

... Petitioners

¶8

Versus

¶9

State of Haryana and others

¶10

... Respondents

¶11

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL

¶12

Present: None.

¶13

¶14

AMIT RAWAL, J. (ORAL)

¶15

Petitioners seek the indulgence of this Court for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing impugned order dated 23/25.07.2019 (Annexure P-1), whereby petitioner No.1 has been transferred from District Jail Yamuna Nagar to District Jail, Jind, whereas petitioner No.2 from District Jail Yamuna Nagar to Central Jail, Hisar-2, which is against policy of 2018 (Annexure P-4). In this regard, they have submitted representation dated 01.08.2019 (Annexure P-3, Colly), but no action has so far been taken.

¶16

Without going into the merits and de-merits of the case, I dispose of the present writ petition with a direction to respondents to consider representation dated 01.08.2019 (Annexure P-3, Colly) and take appropriate decision thereon, in accordance with law, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

¶17

YOGESH SHARMA 2019.08.08 12:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 2

¶18

CWP-21271-2019 (O&M)

¶19

It is made clear that in case, decision is not taken within the time frame, there shall be costs of ` 25,000/- to be paid to petitioners. In case, the claim of petitioners is to be rejected, then a well reasoned and speaking order be passed and conveyed to petitioners. This condition of imposing costs is only to prevent petitioners to run from pillar to post and avail remedy of contempt in case of non-compliance of directions issued by this Court.

¶20

( AMIT RAWAL ) 08.08.2019 JUDGE

¶21

Yogesh Sharma

¶22

Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/ No Whether Reportable Yes/ No

Kushal Pal and Another v. State of Haryana and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kushal Pal and Another v. State of Haryana and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Naresh Kumar Vs State of Haryana and Anr.

Anmol Singh Vs State of Haryana and Others

Sundeep Kumar Vs Chairman-Cum-Managing Director Dhbvn and Others

Radhey Krishan Vs Haryana Vidyut Prasaran Nigam Limited

Dhiraj Kumar Vs State of Haryana and Others

Sushil Kumar Vs State of Haryana and Others