Ramesh Kumar v. State of Haryana and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA…
COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.17754 of 2019 (O&M) Date of Decision.19.08.2019
Ramesh Kumar ...Petitioner Vs State of Haryana and others ...Respondents
Present: Mr. P.K. Sehrawat, Advocate for petitioner.
Mr. R.K. Doon, AAG, Haryana.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
-.-
AMIT RAWAL J. (ORAL)
Reply filed on behalf of respondent No.6 in court today is taken
on record.
State counsel on instructions from ASI Rajender Singh stated that no FIR has been registered. However, it has been pointed out that some departmental proceedings were taken against petitioner, resulting into stoppage of two annual increments with temporary effect vide order dated 30.11.2018. The relevant part of reply is reproduced as under:-
“.....The matter was forwarded by the DSP Loharu for legal opinion and the Ld. Assistant District Attorney opined that no cognizable offence is made out against the petitioner.”
In view of such circumstances, grievance of petitioner no longer subsists, as challenge in writ petition was with regard to impugned order dated 25.02.2019 whereby direction to lodge FIR against petitioner was issued.
Writ petition stands disposed of.
(AMIT RAWAL)
JUDGE
August 19, 2019 Pankaj*
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No
PANKAJ KUMAR 2019.08.21 12:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Ramesh Kumar
State of Haryana
AMIT RAWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court