Gyan Chand v. State of Haryana and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
In this oral disposition of a writ petition seeking directions for pay scale and dearness allowance, the Court did not examine the merits of the case but directed the designated respondent to decide the petitioner's legal notice within three months.
What did the court decide?
Direction to respondent No.3 to decide the legal notice dated 16.01.2019 by passing a well reasoned and speaking order within three months, else pay Rs.25,000 costs.
What the court decided
CWP No.13524 of 2019
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.13524 of 2019 Date of decision:17.08.2019
Gyan Chand
... Petitioner
Vs.
State of Haryana and others
... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
Present:Mr. S.K.Malik, Advocate for the petitioner.
AMIT RAWAL J. (Oral)
Prayer in present writ petition is for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondents to grant the petitioner minimum pay scale alongwith dearness allowance (as revised from time to time) of the post of heavy vehicle driver with effect from the date of joining in lieu of judgment dated 26.10.2016 (Annexure P-7).
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to issue writ of mandamus directing the respondent to grant minimum pay scale and dearness allowance of the heavy vehicle driver post.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Gyan Chand
- respondent
State of Haryana and others
Coram
Amit Rawal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Punjab & Haryana HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- CWP/13524/2019
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court