Petitioner sought withdrawal of Criminal Misc. No. M-8807 of 2018. Court allowed withdrawal on instructions from petitioner's counsel as trial was concluded.
Withdrawal of the petition allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc. No. M-8807 of 2018 (O&M) Date of decision : February 20, 2019
Dinesh Kumar ....Petitioner
versus
State of Haryana ....Respondent
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Fateh Deep Singh
Present : Mr. Deepak Kumar, Advocate for Mr. Arvind Chauhan, Advocate, for the petitioner
Mr. Baljinder Virk, DAG, Haryana for the State
Fateh Deep Singh, J. (Oral)
Learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Dalbir Singh, PS City Kaithal submits that the trial in this case has already been concluded. Faced with this situation, learned counsel for the petitioner has made statement that as per instructions received, he wishes to withdraw the present petition. Allowed to do so.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
( Fateh Deep Singh ) February 20, 2019 Judge 'tiwana'
Whether speaking/reasoned ? Yes/No Whether Reportable ? Yes/No
DALBIR SINGH TIWANA 2019.02.21 14:42 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh.
Dinesh Kumar
State of Haryana
Fateh Deep Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
