The single-judge bench allowed the petitioner to withdraw the criminal miscellaneous petition with liberty to file a fresh one containing better particulars.
Withdrawal of the petition allowed with liberty to file afresh one with better particulars.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc. No. M-43277 of 2018 (O&M) Date of decision : February 15, 2019
Himanshu Verma ....Petitioner versus State of Punjab ....Respondent
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Fateh Deep Singh
Present : Mr. Madhur Goyal, Advocate, for the petitioner Mr. Saurav Khurana, DAG, Punjab, for the State Mr. AK Bishnoi, Advocate, for the complainant
Fateh Deep Singh, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks time to rectify inadvertent errors that have been crept up in the main petition.
( Fateh Deep Singh ) February 15, 2019 Judge 'tiwana'
At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file afresh one with better particulars. Allowed to do so.
Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid.
( Fateh Deep Singh ) February 15, 2019 Judge 'tiwana'
Whether speaking/reasoned ? Yes/No Whether Reportable ? Yes/No
DALBIR SINGH TIWANA 2019.02.28 17:11 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh.
Himanshu Verma
State of Punjab
Fateh Deep Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
