Allowed

Sanjay Thareja and Ors. v. State of Haryana and Anr.

Punjab & Haryana HC25 Sept 2019CRM-M/52148/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is a quashing petition regarding a matrimonial dispute involving offences under sections 498-A and others. The High Court, finding the compromise voluntary and noting the offences are not serious, allowed the petition and quashed the proceedings based on relevant precedents.

What did the court decide?

FIR No. 433 dated 25.3.2014 registered under sections 406, 498-A, 323, 506 IPC and all consequences arising therefrom quashed.

Sanjay Thareja and Ors. Vs State of Haryana… — Matrimonial and Divorce | Punjab & Haryana HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶2

Criminal Misc. No. M-52148 of 2018 (O&M) Date of decision : September 25, 2019

¶3

Sanjay Thareja and others

¶4

....Petitioners

¶5

versus

¶6

State of Haryana and another

¶7

....Respondents

¶8

Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Fateh Deep Singh

¶9

Present : None for the petitioners Mr. Ripu Daman Singh, AAG, Haryana for the State/ respondent no.1 None for respondent no. 2

¶10

Fateh Deep Singh, J. (Oral)

¶11

Record perused.

¶12

Report dated 26.3.2019 of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Panipat has been received after recording statements of accused Sanjay Thareja, Ram Dass Thareja and Jai Devi Thareja as well as complainant Priyanka and the learned court has shown its satisfaction that the compromise is an outcome of voluntariness, free will and without any coercion or undue pressure. In the light of the satisfaction shown by the Court and in view of the fact that it is a pure matrimonial dispute and compromise will go a long way in ironing out the differences and for betterment of their future life and

¶13

DALBIR SINGH TIWANA 2019.10.15 11:47 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh.

¶14

Criminal Misc. No. M-52148 of 2018 (O&M) -2-

¶15

more-so the offences for which the accused have been booked are not of very serious nature and in view of the law laid down in Gian Singh vs State of Punjab and another, 2012 (4) RCR (Criminal) 543 and Kulwinder Singh and others vs State of Punjab and another, 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and in view of which the prayer made in the petition is allowed, proceedings by way of FIR No. 433 dated 25.3.2014 registered at Police Station City Panipat, under sections 406, 498-A, 323, 506 IPC and all consequences arising thereof are quashed, qua the present petitioners.

¶16

The petition stands allowed in those terms.

¶17

( Fateh Deep Singh ) September 25, 2019 Judge 'tiwana'

¶18

Whether speaking/reasoned ? Yes/No Whether Reportable ? Yes/No

¶19

DALBIR SINGH TIWANA 2019.10.15 11:47 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh.

Sanjay Thareja and Ors. v. State of Haryana and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanjay Thareja and Ors. v. State of Haryana and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manu Nagpal Vs State of Punjab and Another

Ved Parkash Vs State of Punjab

Bharti Rani Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

Sakun Narang and Ors. Vs State of Punjab and Anr.

Rajwinder Kaur Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

Navin Kumar Vs State of Haryana & Anr.