Allowed

Navin Kumar v. State of Haryana & Anr.

Punjab & Haryana HC25 Sept 2019CRM-M/48651/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court quashed FIR No. 114 and all consequent proceedings against the petitioner. Relying on section 482 CrPC and precedents Gian Singh and Kulwinder Singh, the court upheld a compromise reached voluntarily in a matrimonial dispute involving non-serious offences.

What did the court decide?

The prayer in the petition is allowed; proceedings by way of FIR No. 114 and all consequences arising thereof are quashed.

Navin Kumar Vs State of Haryana & Anr. — Matrimonial and Divorce | Punjab & Haryana HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶2

Criminal Misc. No. M-48651 of 2018 (O&M) Date of decision : September 25, 2019

Navin

....Petitioner

versus

State of Haryana and another

¶7

....Respondents

¶8

Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Fateh Deep Singh

¶9

Present : Mr. Subhash Chander, Advocate for Mr. SS Khurana, Advocate, for the petitioner

¶10

Mr. Ripu Daman Singh, AAG, Haryana for the State/ respondent no.1

¶11

Mr. Aditya Singh, Advocate, for respondent no. 2

¶12

Fateh Deep Singh, J. (Oral)

¶13

Report dated 8.3.2019 of learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Rewari has been received after recording statements of accused Navin Kumar as well as complainant Sapna and the learned court has shown its satisfaction that the compromise is an outcome of voluntariness, free will and without any coercion or undue pressure. In the light of the satisfaction shown by the Court and in view of the fact that it is a pure matrimonial dispute and compromise will go a long way in ironing out the differences and for

¶14

DALBIR SINGH TIWANA 2019.10.03 13:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh.

¶15

Criminal Misc. No. M-48651 of 2018 (O&M) -2-

¶16

betterment of their future life and more-so the offences for which the accused have been booked are not of very serious nature and in view of the law laid down in Gian Singh vs State of Punjab and another, 2012 (4) RCR (Criminal) 543 and Kulwinder Singh and others vs State of Punjab and another, 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and in view of which the prayer made in the petition is allowed, proceedings by way of FIR No. 114 dated 4.8.2017 registered at Police Station Rewari Sadar, District Rewari under sections 323,34,406,498-A, 506 IPC and all consequences arising thereof are quashed, qua the present petitioner.

¶17

The petition stands allowed in those terms.

¶18

( Fateh Deep Singh ) September 25, 2019 Judge 'tiwana'

¶19

Whether speaking/reasoned ? Yes/No Whether Reportable ? Yes/No

¶20

DALBIR SINGH TIWANA 2019.10.03 13:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh.

Navin Kumar v. State of Haryana & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Navin Kumar v. State of Haryana & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manu Nagpal Vs State of Punjab and Another

Ved Parkash Vs State of Punjab

Bharti Rani Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

Sakun Narang and Ors. Vs State of Punjab and Anr.

Rajwinder Kaur Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

Sanjay Thareja and Ors. Vs State of Haryana and Anr.