Rishu and Another v. State of Haryana and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
This single-judge oral order granted protection in aid to petitioners. The respondent Superintendent of Police was directed to inquire about the genuine need for protection. A fixed deposit of Rs.1 lac was secured by Petitioner No.2 as a precondition for protection.
What did the court decide?
Inquiry directed for protection; fixed deposit of Rs.1 lac required by Petitioner No.2.