Ravi v. State of Haryana
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed the petitioner's bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. holding that he does not deserve bail as he is a proclaimed offender and weapons need to be recovered.
The High Court dismissed the petitioner's bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. holding that he does not deserve bail as he is a proclaimed offender and weapons need to be recovered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-1-
CRM-M-172 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-172 of 2019 Date of Decision: 25.01.2019
Ravi
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana
....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN
Present:Mr. Sunny Namdev, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Munish Sharma, AAG, Haryana.
RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL)
Through instant petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C. prayer has been made for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in a case arising from FIR No.259 dated 21.09.2018 registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 285, 323, 365, 379B, 506 IPC and Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959 (Sections 367, 307 IPC were added later on and Sections 285, 379B IPC and Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959 were deleted) at Police Station Bawani Khera, Bhiwani.
According to the prosecution, on 06.09.2018, petitioner along with his 11-12 accomplice kidnapped the complainant and gave beatings to him on his entire body with iron rods. They also snatched mobile phone and `49,500/- from the complainant and threw him in front of the house of Pankaj extending threats of dire consequences.
Learned State counsel contends that petitioner has already been declared proclaimed offender.
RAVINDER SINGH 2019.01.25 17:49 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
-2-
CRM-M-172 of 2019
Considering above aspect and seriousness of allegations, petitioner does not deserve the concession of regular bail inasmuch as recovery of weapons has to be effected.
Dismissed.
(RAMENDRA JAIN) January 25, 2019 JUDGE R.S. Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
RAVINDER SINGH 2019.01.25 17:49 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
2 issues framed by the court
Whether regular bail should be granted to the petitioner.
Whether the petitioner deserves bail given that he is a proclaimed offender.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ravi
State of Haryana
RAMENDRA JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court