Petitioner sought withdrawal of petition following investigation findings against specific respondents. Court permitted withdrawal with modification of security orders.
Modifications made to orders dated 12.09.2018 and 05.10.2018 regarding security protection for the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-35269-2018
Date of Decision: 04.02.2019
Rekha Rani
.... Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others
.... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN
Present: - Mr. KS Dadwal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. AS Gill, DAG, Punjab.
Mr. Malkeet Singh, Advocate for respondents No. 8 and 9.
RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL)
Learned State counsel submits that thorough investigation has been conducted in the instant case and nothing has been found against respondents No. 8 and 9.
In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the instant petition.
Ordered accordingly.
However, the orders dated 12.09.2018 and 05.10.2018, providing adequate security to the petitioner are modified to the extent that necessary protection be provided to the petitioner as and when necessarily required.
February 04, 2019 (RAMENDRA JAIN) rishu JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
RISHU KATARIA 2019.02.07 16:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Rekha Rani
State of Punjab
Ramendra Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
