Petitioner sought anticipatory bail before the Punjab and Haryana High Court, which was already granted via an earlier order passed on 26.11.2018.
Order dated 26.11.2018 granting anticipatory bail made absolute.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-43436 of 2018 Date of Decision: 01.02.2019
Naveen
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana
....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN
Present:Mr. Akashdeep SIngh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Munish Sharma, AAG, Haryana. Mr. S.K. Bishnoi, Advocate, for the complainant.
RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL)
Through this petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. prayer has been made for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.310 dated 17.08.2017 registered under Sections 323, 341, 147, 149, 506 IPC (Sections 325, 302 IPC added later on) at Police Station Tosham, District Bhiwani.
On instructions from the Investigating Officer, learned State counsel submits that petitioner has joined the investigation and is no more required for interrogation.
Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, order dated 26.11.2018 passed by this Court is made absolute.
Disposed of accordingly.
(RAMENDRA JAIN)
February 01, 2019 JUDGE R.S.
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
RAVINDER SINGH 2019.02.01 17:31 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Naveen
State of Haryana
Ramendra Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
