Single-line order converting interim anticipatory bail into absolute bail for the petitioner, who joined investigation, based on ASI's submission that custody is no longer required.
Interim bail order made absolute on same terms and conditions under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH
Sr. No.: 210
Criminal Miscellaneous No.M-26533 of 2019
Date of Decision: September 02, 2019
Tinku @ Tinka
..... PETITIONER
VERSUS
State of Punjab
..... RESPONDENT
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMOL RATTAN SINGH
PRESENT : - Mr. Tarun Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. A.P.S. Gill, Additional Advocate General, Punjab.
. . .
Amol Rattan Singh, J
Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from ASI Balwinder Singh, submits that the petitioner has joined investigation and his custody is not required presently.
In view of the above fact, the order dated June 11, 2019, granting interim bail to the petitioner, is made absolute on the same terms and conditions. He shall abide by the conditions stipulated in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.
The petition is disposed of accordingly.
(Amol Rattan Singh) September 02, 2019 Judge avin
Whether Speaking/ Reasoned: Yes/ No Whether Reportable: Yes/ No
AVIN KUMAR 2019.09.04 12:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Tinku @ Tinka
State of Punjab
Amol Rattan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
