Oral order dismissing a petition by withdrawing interim bail after the Supreme Court ordered filing a representation and the petitioner did not appear.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-21953 of 2018 (O&M) Date of Decision: 03.05.2019
Payal
...Petitioner
VERSUS
State of Haryana ...Respondent
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA
Present: None for the petitioner.
Ms. Dimple Jain, AAG, Haryana.
SURINDER GUPTA, J. (Oral)
Learned State counsel submits that the petitioner has been convicted by the trial Court vide order dated 29.04.2019 and the case is now fixed for quantum of sentence.
None has appeared for the petitioner.
Order dated 22.10.2018 granting interim bail to petitioner is
withdrawn.
In view of submission of learned State counsel, instant petition
is dismissed.
May 03, 2019 jk
( SURINDER GUPTA ) JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No
JITENDER KUMAR 2019.05.06 10:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Payal
State of Haryana
SURINDER GUPTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
