The petition for Civil Revision was dismissed because the petitioner withdrew the petition before the conclusion of the hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Civil Revision No. 1388 of 2018 (O&M) Date of Decision: May 02, 2019
Som Nath
......PETITIONER
VERSUS
Hukam Singh
.....RESPONDENT
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA
Present: Ms. Shashi Himshikha, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. K.S.Dargan, Advocate for Mr. B.S.Bhalla, Advocate for the respondent.
SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to
withdraw the petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
( SURINDER GUPTA ) May 02, 2019. JUDGE Jyoti-II Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No
JYOTI 2019.05.03 12:28 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Som Nath
Hukam Singh
Surinder Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
