Mandhir Bajaj and Ors. v. Rakesh Tayal and Ors.
Punjab & Haryana HCCR/2421/2017
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Revision petition rendered infructuous as matters filed by respondents had already been decided and prior appeal was dismissed; no substantive decision on merits.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
¶2
Civil Revision No. 2421 of 2017 (O&M) Date of Decision: January 11, 2019
¶3
Mandhir Bajaj and others
¶4
......PETITIONER(s).
¶5
VERSUS
¶6
Rakesh Tayal and others.
¶7
....RESPONDENT(s).
¶8
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA
¶9
Present: None for the petitioners.
¶10
Mr. Punit Jain, Advocate for Mr. Rakesh Gupta, Advocate for the respondents.
¶12
SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral)
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Mandhir Bajaj and others
- respondent
Rakesh Tayal and others
Coram
AI extract
SURINDER GUPTA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Punjab & Haryana HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- CR/2421/2017
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court