Order dismissing/closing the matter by reference to an even-dated judgment. No substantive reasoning or decision provided in this text.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CR No. 1731 of 2013 (O&M) Date of Decision: January 29, 2019
Sulekh Chand
..........PETITIONER
VERSUS
Maninder Kaur and others
........RESPONDENTS
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA
Present: Mr. Divanshu Jain, Advocate for Mr. Ravinder Rana, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Kanwaljit Singh, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ajaivir Singh, Advocate for the respondents.
SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral)
For order see, judgment of even date passed in CR No.6586 of
2012 titled as K.M. Tailor-I Versus Maninder Kaur and others .
( SURINDER GUPTA ) January 29, 2019 JUDGE Jyoti-II Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No
Jyoti 2019.02.05 10:37 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document HIGH COURT, CHANDIGARH
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
K.M. Tailor-I Versus Maninder Kaur and othersReferred¶13
K.M. Tailor-I Versus Maninder Kaur and others (CR No.6586 of 2012)
Sulekh Chand
Maninder Kaur
Surinder Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
