Allowed

Amritdeep Kaur v. Charanpreet Singh

Punjab & Haryana HC24 Jan 2019TA/598/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed a transfer application seeking to move a divorce petition filed by the respondent from Ludhiana to Jalandhar. The transfer consolidated three pending matrimonial cases between the parties to avoid inconvenience and facilitate joint hearings.

What did the court decide?

The divorce petition pending before the Additional District Judge, Ludhiana is transferred to the District Judge/Family Court at Jalandhar.

Amritdeep Kaur Vs Charanpreet Singh — Matrimonial and Divorce | Punjab & Haryana HC (2019)

¶1

TA-598-2018

¶2

-1-

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.

¶4

Transfer Application No.598 of 2018 (O&M) Date of Decision:January 24, 2019.

¶5

Amritdeep Kaur

¶6

......PETITIONER(s).

¶7

VERSUS

¶8

Charanpreet Singh

¶9

....RESPONDENT(s).

¶10

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA

¶11

Present: Mr. Prabhjot Singh, Advocate for Mr. Amit Dhawan, Advocate for the petitioner (s).

¶12

Ms. Monika Thakur, Advocate for the respondent.

¶13

¶14

SURINDER GUPTA, J.

¶15

Heard.

¶16

This is application seeking transfer of the divorce petition filed by the respondent at Ludhiana to District Judge/Family Court at Jalandhar, where other two cases between the parties including petition filed under Section 12 of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 and another petition under Section 125 Code of Criminal Procedure are also pending.

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that applicant is having old parents and is unable to travel distance of about 70 kilometres on each and every date of hearing, as such, the divorce petition filed by the respondent be also transferred to Jalandhar.

¶18

SACHIN MEHTA 2019.01.28 12:16 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document HIGH COURT, CHANDIGARH

¶19

TA-598-2018

¶20

-2-

¶21

The parties to the petition are pursuing various litigations relating to their matrimonial dispute in Courts at Jalandhar and Ludhiana. It will be in the interest of justice that all pending cases between them are tried and decide at one place. This will avoid inconvenience to both the parties as all the cases filed by the parties can be taken up on one date of hearing and this will avoid their repeated rounds to Court.

¶22

In view of above discussion, this petition is allowed. Petition titled as “ Charanpreet Singh Vs. Amritdeep Kaur” pending before the Court of Additional District Judge, Ludhiana is ordered to be transferred to the Court of District Judge/Family Court at Jalandhar for further proceedings in accordance with law.

¶23

( SURINDER GUPTA ) January 24, 2019. JUDGE Sachin M. Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No

¶24

SACHIN MEHTA 2019.01.28 12:16 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document HIGH COURT, CHANDIGARH

Amritdeep Kaur v. Charanpreet Singh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Amritdeep Kaur v. Charanpreet Singh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shanti Devi and Others Vs Sunil Kumar and Others

Dharam Vir Bansal Vs Ashish Kumar & Anr.

Sandeep Kaur Vs Sukhdev Singh

Dharmender Kumar Vs Oriental Bank of Commerce and Ors.

Tejvir Singh Vs Pankaj Gupta

Om Parkash Vs Shiromani Gurudwara Sangat Sahib