In a civil revision regarding an ejectment petition, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed the petitioner to join proceedings at the existing stage but rejected a request for a de novo trial while vacating an interim order.
Petitioner allowed to join proceedings; interim order of 20.03.2018 vacated; Rent Controller directed to proceed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Civil Revision No.1546 of 2018 (O&M) Date of Decision: May 01, 2019
Naresh Kumar
..........PETITIONER
VERSUS
Manohar Lal and another
........RESPONDENTS
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA
Present: Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Vikas Bahl, Senior Advocate with Ms. Priyanka Kansal, Advocate for respondent No.1.
SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral)
With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, this revision
petition is disposed of in following terms:
(ii) His joining, however, will not result in de- novo trial.
With these observations, interim order dated 20.03.2018 is
vacated and the Rent Controller is directed to proceed further in the matter.
May 01, 2019. Jyoti-II
( SURINDER GUPTA ) JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No
JYOTI 2019.05.02 14:11 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Naresh Kumar
Manohar Lal
Another
Surinder Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
