This judgment is an oral discontinuation order. The learned judge dismissed the contempt petition as infructuous on the grounds that the petitioner's grievance was already vindicated, thus no cause of action survived.
The contempt petition disposed of as having become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
YOGESH SHARMA 2019.02.01 09:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 1
COCP-3942-2018 (O&M)
141
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP-3942-2018 (O&M) Date of decision : 30.01.2019
Bhupinder Singh
... Petitioner
Versus
M.P. Singh and others
... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
Present: Mr. Kuljinder Singh Billing, Advocate for Mr. S.S. Rangi, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Kanisth Ganeriwala, AAG, Punjab.
AMIT RAWAL, J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that no cause of
action survives in the present contempt petition as his grievance stands vindicated.
In view of above, the contempt petition stands disposed of as
having been become infructuous.
30.01.2019 ( AMIT RAWAL ) Yogesh Sharma JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/ No Whether Reportable Yes/ No
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present contempt petition is maintainable when the underlying grievance has been vindicated.
Bhupinder Singh
M.P. Singh
AMIT RAWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
