The court held that as the impugned order had been complied with, no useful purpose would be served in continuing the contempt petition. Accordingly, the petition was dismissed.
The rule issued against the respondent stands discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
221
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP-1065-2018 Date of Decision: February 25, 2019
Vishal Malik .....Petitioner
Versus
Mandeep Singh Brar and another
......Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE NIRMALJIT KAUR
Present: Mr.Baldev Singh Badhran, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr.Prateek Mahajan, Advocate for the respondents.
NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (ORAL)
It is not disputed that the order has since been complied with.
In this view of the matter, no useful purpose would be served in
continuing with the contempt petition. The same is hereby dismissed.
The rule issued against the respondent(s) stands discharged.
In case the petitioner is still aggrieved in any manner, he is at
liberty to challenge the said order in accordance with law.
February 25, 2019 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) meenuss JUDGE
1. Whether speaking/reasoned ? Yes/No 2. Whether reportable ? Yes/No
MEENU 2019.02.26 11:13 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh
Vishal Malik
Mandeep Singh Brar
Nirmaljit Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
