Allowance of an application for exemption. Subsequent dismissal of a contempt petition filed for non-compliance of the earlier order, as the orders had been complied with.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
225
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP-1207-2018(O&M) Date of Decision: February 22, 2019
Subhash Chander .....Petitioner
Versus
Shri Rajiv Rattan ......Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE NIRMALJIT KAUR
Present: None for the petitioner. Mr.Sandeep S.Mann, Sr.DAG,Haryana.
NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (ORAL)
CM-7505-CII-2018
Application for exemption is allowed, as prayed for.
COCP-1207-2018
The contempt petition is filed for non-compliance of the order
dated 28.11.2017.
Reply is filed. As per the said reply, the order has been complied with by granting the benefits and releasing the said arrears way back on 29.05.2017, the details of which has been placed on record.
In view of this, contempt petition is dismissed.
The rule issued against the respondent(s) stands discharged.
February 22, 2019 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) meenuss JUDGE
1. Whether speaking/reasoned ? Yes/No 2. Whether reportable ? Yes/No
MEENU 2019.02.25 11:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh
Subhash Chander
Shri Rajiv Rattan
Nirmaljit Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
