This case was called for arguments in an appeal but was dismissed for want of prosecution as no one appeared to press the appeal on either the hearing date or previous adjournings.
Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution. No relief granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I N THE HI GH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDI GARH
LPA No. 89 of 2018 ( O&M) DATE OF DECI SI ON: 03. 10. 2018
Har dev Si ngh and ot her s
…. . Appel l ant s
ver sus
Fi nanci al Commi ssi oner ( Revenue) , Punj ab and ot her s
CORAM: - HON’ BLE MR. JUSTI CE KRI SHNA MURARI , CHI EF JUSTI CE HON’ BLE MR. JUSTI CE ARUN PALLI , JUDGE
Pr esent : None
KRI SHNA MURARI , CHI EF JUSTI CE : ( Or al )
Case cal l ed out . No one appear s on behal f of appel l ant s t o pr ess t hi s appeal . Or der sheet s i ndi cat e t hat on t he pr evi ous occasi ons al so no one appear ed f or t he appel l ant s and st i l l t he mat t er was adj our ned.
Si nce no one has appear ed t o pr ess t hi s appeal , t he same st ands di smi ssed f or want of pr osecut i on.
( KRI SHNA MURARI ) CHI EF JUSTI CE
( ARUN PALLI ) JUDGE
NOTE: Whet her speaki ng/ non- speaki ng: Speaki ng Whet her r epor t abl e: YES/ NO
PARKASH CHAND 2018.10.04 14:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Hardev Singh and others
Financial Commissioner (Revenue), Punjab and others
KRISHNA MURARI
ARUN PALLI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
