The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed an appeal as it was withdrawn by the counsel for the appellants and the prayer to permit withdrawal was allowed.
Prayer to permit withdrawal of appeal allowed; appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I N THE HI GH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDI GARH
LPA No. 1485 of 2018 ( O&M) DATE OF DECI SI ON: 01. 10. 2018
Usha Devi & ot her s
…. . Appel l ant s
ver sus
Managi ng Di r ect or , Har yana Vi dhut Par sar an Ni gam and ot her s
. . . . . Respondent s
CORAM: - HON’ BLE MR. JUSTI CE KRI SHNA MURARI , CHI EF JUSTI CE HON’ BLE MR. JUSTI CE ARUN PALLI , JUDGE
Pr esent : Shr i Di wan S. Adl akha, Advocat e f or t he appel l ant s
KRI SHNA MURARI , CHI EF JUSTI CE : ( Or al )
Af t er t he mat t er was hear d f or some t i me, l ear ned counsel f or t he appel l ant s made a pr ayer t o per mi t wi t hdr awal of t hi s appeal .
Pr ayer made i s al l owed.
Appeal i s di smi ssed as wi t hdr awn.
( KRI SHNA MURARI ) CHI EF JUSTI CE
( ARUN PALLI ) JUDGE
par kash
NOTE: Whet her speaki ng/ non- speaki ng: Speaki ng Whet her r epor t abl e: YES/ NO
PARKASH CHAND 2018.10.03 12:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Usha Devi and others
Managing Director, Haryana Vidhut Parasran Nigam and others
Krishna Murari
Arun Palli
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
