Petitioner sought withdrawal of a writ petition claiming reinstatement as an ETT teacher. The High Court allowed the withdrawal application and dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn.
Application for withdrawal allowed; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Shivani Gupta 2018.05.30 14:26
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.M. No. 7941-CWP of 2018 in/and CWP No. 9576 of 2017 Date of decision: 29.05.2018
Prabhjot Kaur
....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State of Punjab and others
...Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SANDHAWALIA
Present: Mr. Kapil Kakkar, Advocate, for the applicant-petitioner.
Mr. Kanisth Ganeriwala, AAG, Punjab.
G.S.SANDHAWALIA, J. (Oral)
C.M. No. 7941-CI of 2018
Application has been filed for withdrawal of the main writ petition on the ground that the petitioner has been reinstated into service and she has joined as ETT teacher on 24.10.2017.
Accordingly, the application is allowed. The hearing of the case is pre-poned from 12.10.2018 to today.
CWP No. 9576 of 2017
In view of the above, the writ petition stands dismissed as
withdrawn.
29.05.2018 (G.S. SANDHAWALIA) shivani JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
Prabhjot Kaur
State of Punjab
G.S. SANDHAWALIA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
