Mukhtiar Singh v. State of Haryana and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 93 of 2018 Date of decision : 05.07.2018
Mukhtiar Singh
... Petitioner
versus
State of Haryana and others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI
Present: Mr. Ram Niwas Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Hitesh Pandit, Addl. A.G. Haryana
Mr. Harkesh Manuja, Advocate for respondent No. 3
RITU BAHRI , J. (Oral)
At the very outset, learned counsel submits that the present
petition has become rendered infructuous.
Dismissed as having become rendered infructuous.
( RITU BAHRI) JUDGE
05.07.2018 G Arora
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No
Gaurav Arora 2018.07.06 17:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Mukhtiar Singh
State of Haryana
Ritu Bahri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court