Kennu v. State of Punjab and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 13513 of 2018 Date of decision : 04.07.2018
Kennu
... Petitioner
versus
State of Punjab and others ...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI
Present: Mr. J.S. Grewal, Advocate for the petitioner.
RITU BAHRI , J. (Oral)
This petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is for issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondent No 1 to 3 for extension of parole till 01.07.2018 (which has been granted on 11.05.2018 till 27.05.2018)
The prayer made by the petitioner cannot be look into at this
stage, as the present petition has become rendered infructuous.
Dismissed as having become rendered infructuous.
( RITU BAHRI) JUDGE 04.07.2018 G Arora Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No
Gaurav Arora 2018.07.05 16:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Kennu
State of Punjab
RITU BAHRI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court