Disposed

Rupinder Singh v. Pspcl and Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC11 Jan 2018CWP/26835/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of a writ petition filed by an employee seeking mandamus to direct PSU authorities to decide his legal notice regarding gratuity and other dues payable with interest.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the Chief Engineer to look into grievances raised in the legal notice and decide the same within three months of receipt of the certified copy of this order.

Rupinder Singh Vs Pspcl and Ors. — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Punjab & Haryana HC (2018)

¶1

CWP No.26835 OF 2017

¶2

--1--

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶4

CWP No. 26835 OF 2017

¶5

DECIDED ON: JANUARY 11, 2018

RUPINDER SINGH

.....PETITIONER

VERSUS

PUNJAB STATE POWER CORP. LTD., PATIALA .....RESPONDENTS AND OTHERS

¶10

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASPAL SINGH

¶11

Present: Mr. H.K. Brinda, Advocate, for the petitioner.

¶12

¶13

JASPAL SINGH, J (ORAL)

¶14

By virtue of instant petition preferred under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, petitioner has sought issuance of a writ in the nature mandamus, directing the respondents to determine and pay the amount of gratuity and other dues payable with interest @ 18% per annum from due date till payment.

¶15

At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though legal notice dated 07.10.2017 (Annexure P-4) has been duly served upon the respondents but till date no conscious decision has been taken. He further submits that petitioner feels satisfied in case direction is issued to respondent No.2 to decide aforesaid legal notice, in a time bound manner.

¶16

Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the instant petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent No.2-Chief

¶17

Sonika 2018.01.12 11:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

¶18

CWP No.26835 OF 2017

¶19

--2--

¶20

Engineer Esstt. Section, Guru Gobind Singh Super Thermal Plant Rupnagar, Rupnagar to look into the grievances unfolded by the petitioner in his legal notice dated 07.10.2017 (Annexure P-4) and to decide the same, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

¶21

However, if the petitioner still feels aggrieved against any of the order(s) passed by the concerned authority, he shall be at liberty to approach this Court.

¶22

JANUARY 11, 2018 (JASPAL SINGH) sonika JUDGE

¶23

Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable Yes/No

¶24

Sonika 2018.01.12 11:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

Rupinder Singh v. Pspcl and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rupinder Singh v. Pspcl and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Om Parkash Vs State of Haryana and Ors.

Sukhwant Singh Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

Veer Singh Vs State of Punjab & Ors.

Vishal Chalana Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

Santosh Kumari Vs State of Punjab and Anr.

Radha Krishan Vs State of Punjab and Anr.