OCONED in the High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowing a petitioner approached wanting to withdraw a CWP on grounds that sought relief was prioritized granted previously rendering the instant petition furtherured.
Petition dismissed as rendered infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 21176 OF 2017 DECIDED ON: JANUARY 11, 2018
VISHAL CHALANA
.....PETITIONER
VERSUS
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
.....RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASPAL SINGH
Present: Mr. Harpreet Singh Jakhal, Advocate, for the petitioner.
JASPAL SINGH, J (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the relief claimed through instant petition has already been granted to the petitioner. As such, he be permitted to withdraw the instant petition.
JANUARY 11, 2018 (JASPAL SINGH) sonika JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
Sonika 2018.01.12 11:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
Vishal Chalana
State of Punjab and Others
Jaspal Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
