Disposed

Rohtas Kumar and Others v. State of Haryana and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC21 Aug 2018CWP/21010/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a written petition for issuance of a writ in nature of mandamus, the petitioner sought promotion to the post of Head Master. The Court, noting a similar petition previously disposed of by this court, directed the respondents to consider representation and pass appropriate orders within six weeks in accordance with the earlier judgment, quashing any seniority avoiding action.

What did the court decide?

Directed Respondent No. 2 to consider representation dated 03.07.2018 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within six weeks.

Rohtas Kumar and Others Vs State of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Punjab & Haryana HC (2018)

¶1

CWP No. 21010-2018

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶4

CWP No. 21010 of 2018 Date of decision : 21.08.2018

¶5

Rohtas Kumar and ors.

¶6

... Petitioners

¶7

versus

¶8

State of Haryana and others

¶9

...Respondents

¶10

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI

¶11

Present: Mr. Gaurav Jain, Advocate for the petitioners.

¶12

¶13

RITU BAHRI , J. (Oral)

¶14

The present petition is for issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to consider and promote the petitioners to the post of Head Master w.e.f the date from which several juniors including respondent Nos. 3 and 4 have been promoted vide order dated 06.10.2017 passed by Government Haryana School Education Department, Chandigarh (P-3) vide which promotion given w.e.f 10.02.2014.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner at the very outset states that similar petition i.e CWP No. 16905-2018 has come up for consideration before this Court and this Court vide order dated 13.07.2018 dispose of the petition by giving a direction to the Director, School Education to look into the legal notice dated 01.06.2018 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the matter in issue is squarely covered by an order and judgment dated 13.07.2018 (Annexure P-7), rendered by this Court in CWP No. 16905 of 2018 (Dharampal V. State of Haryana and others) , therefore, the present

¶17

Gaurav Arora 2018.09.18 16:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

¶18

CWP No. 21010-2018

¶19

¶20

petition too is required to be disposed of in the same terms.

¶21

Notice of motion.

¶22

Mr. Hitesh Pandit, Additional A.G. Haryana, present in Court, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Copies furnished. The factual position, as set out above, is not disputed by the learned State counsel, who rather fairly submits that the matter at hands is, indeed, required to be disposed of in terms of the decision of this Court, referred to above.

¶23

That being so, the petition is disposed of, in terms of the decision of this Court in Dharampal (supra) . Respondent No. 2 will consider and pass appropriate orders on the representation dated 03.07.2018 (P-6) in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

¶24

( RITU BAHRI) JUDGE

¶25

21.08.2018 G Arora Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No

¶26

Gaurav Arora 2018.09.18 16:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

Rohtas Kumar and Others v. State of Haryana and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rohtas Kumar and Others v. State of Haryana and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Paramjeet Kaur Vs State of Haryana & Others

Inayat Chaudhary Vs State of Haryana and Ors.

Shyam Sunder Ahuja Vs State of Haryana and Others

Rahul Raj and Ors. Vs Ms. Bhanu Vig Principal Ihmc Kurukshetra and Ors.

Rakesh Kumar Aneja and Ors. Vs State of Haryana and Ors.

Ajay Kumar and Another Vs State of Haryana and Another