Disposed

Harmanjit Singh and Anr. v. State of Punjab and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC20 Dec 2018CRM-M/61861/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single-judge order where the High Court, at the behest of counsel, directed a Senior Superintendent of Police to consider representations regarding threats against the petitioners based on their claim of having performed a marriage and issued directions to ensure their safety while reserving criminal liability.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the Senior Superintendent of Police, Rural, District Amritsar, to consider the petitioner's representation dated 17.12.2018 and issue necessary orders to ensure safety from private respon

Harmanjit Singh and Anr. Vs… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Punjab & Haryana HC (2018)

¶1

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh

¶2

Criminal Misc. No. M-61861 of 2018

¶3

Date of Decision: 20.12.2018

¶4

Harmanjit Singh and Another

¶5

... Petitioner(s)

¶6

Versus

¶7

State of Punjab and Others

¶8

... Respondent(s)

¶9

CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shekher Dhawan.

¶10

Present: Mr. Sanjeet Singh Taank, Advocate for the petitioner(s).

¶11

Shekher Dhawan, J.

¶12

Both the petitioners are present in the Court and are identified by their counsel.

¶13

Petitioners have sought protection of their lives and liberty, inter-alia , taking the plea that they performed the marriage with each other, whereas private respondents are not accepting their marriage and now they are apprehending danger to their lives and liberty from private respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioners contended that the petitioners performed marriage on 10.12.2018.

¶14

Petitioners have also taken the plea that they are major and have

¶15

performed their marriage with free will.

¶16

Notice of motion.

¶17

On the asking of the Court, Mr. Ashok Kumar Singla, Senior

¶18

DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ2018.12.20 12:48 Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶19

Criminal Misc. No. M-61861 of 2018 2

¶20

respondents No.1 to 3. A complete copy of paper-book be provided to him during the course of the day.

¶21

Having considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners and perusal of record, respondent No.2-Senior Superintendent of Police, Rural, District Amritsar, is directed to consider the representation dated 17.12.2018 (Annexure P5) and issue necessary orders, as warranted by law, so as to ensure that no harm is caused to the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of private respondents.

¶22

However, it is also made clear that this order shall not be taken to validate the alleged marriage of the petitioners or entitle them for any protection against their arrest or continuance of any criminal proceedings, if they are found involved in the commission of any cognizable offence. In case, the petitioners had committed any offence, the law will take its own course.

¶23

With the aforesaid observations made and directions issued, the

¶24

present petition stands disposed of.

¶25

( Shekher Dhawan) Judge

¶26

December 20, 2018 “DK”

¶27

Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No

¶28

DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2018.12.20 12:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Harmanjit Singh and Anr. v. State of Punjab and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Harmanjit Singh and Anr. v. State of Punjab and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Asha Yadav Vs State of Haryana and Others

Kuldeep Singh @ Rimpy Vs State of Punjab

Chaman Singh and Anr. Vs State of Punjab

Sunny Vs State of Punjab

Ranjit Singh Vs State of Punjab & Ors.

Arif and Another Vs State of Haryana and Others