Disposed

Asha Yadav v. State of Haryana and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC19 Dec 2018CRM-M/57401/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single Judge disposed of a Criminal Misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. directing the Commissioner of Police, Faridabad, to examine a representation dated 25.09.2018 and take necessary action to add grievous injury sections in an FIR based on medical opinion.

What did the court decide?

Directions issued to Respondent No.3 (Commissioner of Police, District Faridabad) to look into the representation dated 25.09.2018 and take required action thereon as per law.

Asha Yadav Vs State of Haryana and Others — Cheating and Forgery | Punjab & Haryana HC (2018)

¶1

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh

¶2

Criminal Misc. No. M-57401 of 2018

¶3

Date of Decision: 19.12.2018

¶4

Dr. Asha Yadav

¶5

... Petitioner(s)

¶6

Versus State of Haryana and Others ... Respondent(s)

¶7

CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shekher Dhawan.

¶8

Present: Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner(s).

¶9

Shekher Dhawan, J.

¶10

Present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for issuance of directions to the official respondents to add Sections 326, 307 & 365 IPC in case FIR No. 22 dated 28.08.2018, registered under Sections 323, 506 & 34 IPC at Police Station Adarsh Nagar, District Faridabad on the basis of medical opinion.

¶11

Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that though, initially FIR was registered under Sections 323, 506 & 34 IPC, but even after receipt of medical opinion declaring the injury to be grievous on the eye of the victim, relevant sections have not been added in the FIR and inquiry has not been carried out in an effective manner. Learned counsel further contended that petitioner has made a representation dated 25.09.2018 (Annexure P6) to respondent No.3-Commissioner of Police, District DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ2018.12.19 12:47 Faridabad, but still no action has been taken thereon. I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶12

Criminal Misc. No. M-57401 of 2018

¶13

¶14

Notice of motion.

¶15

On asking of the Court, Mr. Neeraj Poswal, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of respondents. A complete copy of paper-book be provided to him during the course of the day.

¶16

In view of above, present petition stands disposed of with the directions to respondent No.3-Commissioner of Police, District Faridabad to look into representation dated 25.09.2018 (Annexure P6) and take the required action thereon, as per law.

¶17

( Shekher Dhawan) Judge December 19, 2018 “DK” Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No

¶18

DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2018.12.19 12:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Asha Yadav v. State of Haryana and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Asha Yadav v. State of Haryana and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rani Malhotra Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

Gurmeet Singh Vs State of Punjab and Others

Harjinder Pal Gogna Vs State of Punjab and Others

Lali Devi Vs State of Haryana and Ors.

Bal Krishan Garg Vs M/S Mukesh Udyog Ltd. (Steel Division)

Mohit Madaan & Anr. Vs State of Haryana and Ors.