Disposed
Dinesh Kumar v. State of Haryana
Punjab & Haryana HCCRM-M/48653/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-48653-2017 Date of Decision:- 29.01.2018
Dinesh Kumar
.....Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana
.....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHABIR SINGH SINDHU
Present: Mr. Pradeep Virk, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Vikas Malik, DAG, Haryana.
MAHABIR SINGH SINDHU, J. (Oral)
Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Nirmal Singh, has stated that the petitioner has already joined the investigation and his custodial investigation is not required in this case.
In view of above, the interim order dated 20.12.2017 is hereby made absolute, subject to the conditions as envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. and the present petition stands disposed of.
| January 29, 2018 naresh.k |
( M | AHABIR SINGH SINDHU ) JUDGE |
|---|---|---|
| Whether speaking/reasoned | No | |
| Whether reportable | No |
Naresh Kumar 2018.01.30 15:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Dinesh Kumar
State of Haryana
Mahabir Singh Sindhu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court