The High Court of Punjab and Haryana, in a listed bail petition, made an interim order absolute since the petitioner had already joined the investigation. The petition disposed of under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. conditions.
Interim order dated 06.11.2017 made absolute; petition disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-41551-2017 Date of Decision:- 29.01.2018
Ajit Kumar and another
.....Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab
.....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHABIR SINGH SINDHU
Present: Mr. G.S. Sandhu, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Harbir Sandhu, AAG, Punjab.
MAHABIR SINGH SINDHU, J. (Oral)
Learned State counsel, on instructions from SI Harjeet Singh, has stated that the petitioners have already joined the investigation and their custodial investigation is not required in this case.
In view of above, the interim order dated 06.11.2017 is hereby made absolute, subject to the conditions as envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. and the present petition stands disposed of.
( MAHABIR SINGH SINDHU ) January 29, 2018 JUDGE naresh.k
| Whether speaking/reasoned | No |
|---|---|
| Whether reportable | No |
Naresh Kumar 2018.01.30 15:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ajit Kumar and another
State of Punjab
Mahabir Singh Sindhu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
