HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT…
Interim order pertaining to anticipatory bail made absolute
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-30450-2017 Date of Decision:- 16.01.2018
Rashid Khan
.....Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana
.....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHABIR SINGH SINDHU
Present: Mr. Namit Khurana, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Vikas Malik, DAG, Haryana.
MAHABIR SINGH SINDHU, J. (Oral)
Learned State counsel has fairly stated that the petitioners have already joined the investigation and their custodial investigation is not required in this case.
In view of above, the interim order dated 21.08.2017 is hereby made absolute, subject to the conditions as envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. and the present petition stands disposed of.
January 16, 2018
naresh.k
| ( MAHABIR SINGH SINDHU ) JUDGE |
|
|---|---|
| Whether speaking/reas | oned No |
| Whether reportable | No |
Naresh Kumar 2018.01.18 09:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Rashid Khan
State of Haryana
Mahabir Singh Sindhu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
