The petition was withdrawn by the petitioner's counsel; the impugned writ petition was dismissed on the withdrawal prayer without any substantive reasoning or legal proposition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-16044-2017 (O&M) Date of Decision:- 15.01.2018
Abhishek Chetal
.....Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
.....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHABIR SINGH SINDHU
Present: Ms. Isha Goyal, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Harbir Sandhu, AAG, Punjab.
MAHABIR SINGH SINDHU, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw the
present petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn, as prayed for.
( MAHABIR SINGH SINDHU ) January 15, 2018 JUDGE naresh.k Whether speaking/reasoned No Whether reportable No
Naresh Kumar 2018.01.16 12:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Abhishek Chetal
State of Punjab
Mahabir Singh Sindhu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
