Court set aside impugned order closing evidence and directed trial court to grant one last opportunity to petitioner to conclude evidence pending payment of Rs 50,000 costs.
Impugned order set aside; trial court to grant one opportunity to conclude evidence subject to payment of Rs 50,000 costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-1-
Civil Revision No.7527 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Revision No.7527 of 2017 Date of decision: 11.01.2018
M/s Maharaja Wool and Fibers
.......Petitioner
versus
M/s Shankar Dass Pran Nath Surgical Private Ltd. and another
......Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN
Present: - Mr. D.R. Punia, Advocate, for the petitioner.
RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL)
Prayer through instant revision petition has been made for grant of one opportunity to the petitioner-plaintiff to conclude its evidence which has been closed vide order dated 31.08.2017 by the trial Court, Ludhiana, after affording several opportunities to the petitioner-plaintiff.
Heard.
In the interest of justice, impugned order dated 31.08.2017 is set aside. Trial Court is directed to grant one opportunity to the petitioner to conclude its entire evidence subject to payment of costs of ` 50,000/-, out of which 50% shall be paid to the respondents and remaining shall be deposited with the Punjab State Legal Services Authority.
This petition is disposed of without issuing notice to the respondents with a view to impart justice to the parties and to save the huge Ravinder Singh 2018.01.12 16:54 I attest to the accuracy andauthenticity of this documentexpenses which may be incurred by the respondents and also to avoid
-2-
Civil Revision No.7527 of 2017
unnecessary delay in the adjudication of the matter. Still, if dissatisfied, the respondents may move this Court for recalling this order within six weeks from today.
(Ramendra Jain) Judge
January 11, 2018 R.S.
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No.
Ravinder Singh 2018.01.12 16:54 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
M/s Maharaja Wool and Fibers
M/s Shankar Dass Pran Nath Surgical Private Ltd.
Ramendra Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
